iShares S&P 100 ETF

Fund offered by:

Ticker: OEF

Carbon footprint
emissions per unit of investment

Expresses the greenhouse gas footprint of an investment sum. Relative carbon footprint is measured in metric tonnes of CO₂ or CO₂ equivalents per $1 million USD invested. A fund's carbon footprint accounts for direct and indirect (scope 1 and 2) emissions.

LOW compared to benchmarks

How do we compare funds to benchmarks?

Show all benchmarks

Carbon intensity
emissions per unit of revenue

Expresses the carbon efficiency of a portfolio. Relative carbon intensity is measured in metric tonnes of CO₂ or CO₂ equivalents per $1 million USD revenue. A fund's carbon intensity accounts for direct and indirect (scope 1 and 2) emissions.

LOW compared to benchmarks

How do we compare funds to benchmarks?

Show all benchmarks

Carbon footprint profile is provided by yourSRI. Metrics like carbon footprint and carbon intensity are calculated by tracking and measuring the greenhouse gas emissions of the underlying companies owned by the fund.

iShares S&P 100 ETF

Benchmark: MSCI ACWI^*

Emissions scope 1+2
tCO2e

257,950

813,381

Emissions scope 1+2+3
tCO2e

1.24M

3.04M

Coverage
by # of disclosing titles

91%

57%

Coverage
by market value weight

99%

97%

* Full emissions and coverage data for MSCI ACWI benchmark provided by yourSRI

Emissions of the top 10 fund holdings

Top 10 holdings, portfolio weight and emissions weight (Scope 1 + 2)

What does this mean?

Fossil fuels

OEF

Clean200

Sustainability report card

As You Sow’s Invest Your Values report card grades mutual funds on environmental and social issues, including climate change, gender equality, and weapon investments. Click through to get more details on each issue.

iShares S&P 100 ETF [OEF]

Basic

Expanded

Fossil fuels
Investments in coal, oil, and natural gas energy and utility companies

Deforestation
Investments in deforestation-risk agricultural commodities, and related financial companies and consumer brands

Gender equality
Gender equality group ranking, based on Equileap company data

Civilian firearms
Investments in civilian firearms manufacturers and gun retailers

Prison industrial complex
Investments in prisons and borders industry

Military weapons
Investments in military arms manufacturers and services companies

Tobacco
Investments in tobacco and e-cigarette manufacturers, and tobacco-promoting entertainment companies

Search more funds

Financial performance

Performance data provided by

Find more financial data on OEF at Morningstar.com

Current fund

OEF

iShares S&P 100 ETF

Family

BlackRock/iShares

Category

Large Blend

Find another fund

vs.

Benchmark

IVV

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

Family

iShares from BlackRock

Category

Large Blend

Change benchmark

Fund comparison settings

Investment timeline

Performance as of: 2/28/21

1 year

3 years

5 years

10 years

Benchmark

Suggested: S&P 500

Fund comparison results

Compared to the benchmark, this fund has:

Higher

10-yr returns

0.12% more in annualized returns

Less invested in fossil fuels

0.42% less invested

Lower carbon footprint

32 tonnes CO2e/$1M USD lower

More invested in Clean200

1.63% more invested

Current fund

OEF

iShares S&P 100 ETF

Family

BlackRock/iShares

Category

Large Blend

Find another fund

vs.

Benchmark

IVV

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

Family

iShares from BlackRock

Category

Large Blend

Change benchmark

Fund comparison settings

Investment timeline

Performance as of: 2/28/21

1 year

3 years

5 years

10 years

Benchmark

Suggested: S&P 500

Fund comparison results

Compared to the benchmark, this fund has:

Higher

10-yr returns

0.12% more in annualized returns

Less invested in fossil fuels

0.42% less invested

Lower carbon footprint

32 tonnes CO2e/$1M USD lower

More invested in Clean200

1.63% more invested

Current fund

OEF

iShares S&P 100 ETF

Family

BlackRock/iShares

Category

Large Blend

Find another fund

vs.

Benchmark

IVV

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

Family

iShares from BlackRock

Category

Large Blend

Change benchmark

Fund comparison settings

Investment timeline

Performance as of: 2/28/21

1 year

3 years

5 years

10 years

Benchmark

Suggested: S&P 500

Fund comparison results

Compared to the benchmark, this fund has:

Higher

10-yr returns

0.12% more in annualized returns

Less invested in fossil fuels

0.42% less invested

Lower carbon footprint

32 tonnes CO2e/$1M USD lower

More invested in Clean200

1.63% more invested

Month-end trailing returns

Performance as of date: 2/28/21

Morningstar suggested benchmark: S&P 500 TR USD

Annualized returns

Climate analysis

1-yr

3-yr

5-yr

10-yr

This fund
OEF - iShares S&P 100 ETF

33%

15%

17%

13%

37 tCO2e

Benchmark

31%

14%

17%

13%

69 tCO2e

Fund compared to benchmark

1.44%

0.85%

0.43%

0.12%

32 tCO2e lower

Find more financial data on OEF at Morningstar.com

What's next?

Learn how to make a change and move your money

Get started with our action toolkit

Action toolkit

Recent blog posts

Updating the Invest Your Values rating methodologies

Jan 21, 2021

Periodically, we review the Invest Your Values rating methodologies and adjust how we're assigning the A, B, C, D, and F letter grades. As the market changes, the distribution of exposure to companies changes, and the distribution of funds across grade groups can get skewed. By regularly measuring the distribution of results and adjusting the grade assignments, we aim to keep everything up to date.

Defining Sustainable Investments

Nov 12, 2020

We’ve updated Fossil Free Funds and the other Invest Your Values tools to use a more selective definition of “sustainability mandate”, applying it only to funds that have an intentional focus on environmental and/or social issues when choosing what companies to hold in the portfolio.

The world’s largest asset managers have failed to prevent the global forest fire crisis

Sep 15, 2020

A guest post from Jeff Conant, Senior International Forest Program Managers at Friends of the Earth U.S. A new report from Friends of the Earth U.S. finds that the largest asset managers are undermining efforts by consumer brands and agribusiness companies to halt deforestation.